溫故知新 Old wisdom, today’s insight — ONGO

DAY 66

I Heard of Punishing One Fellow, Not of Killing a King

answered by Mencius, King Hui of Liang II
기원전 4세기(맹자 언행록)
🎬 TODAY'S FILM — IT ASKS THIS
Judgment at Nuremberg (1961)
dir. Stanley Kramer · USA
How far can 'I only followed orders' absolve a person? If it was commanded from above, may one switch off the voice of conscience — or can no authority ever stand in for the final scale of right and wrong?
THE QUESTION THE FILM ASKS

Do I justify the conscience I switched off myself with the reason that 'it was ordered from above'?

THE CLASSIC'S ANSWER · ORIGINAL
聞誅一夫
賊仁者謂之賊 … 聞誅一夫紂矣 未聞弑君也
📜 THE CLASSIC'S ANSWER

He who ruins benevolence is called a robber. I have heard of the punishing of one mere fellow, but not of the killing of a king.

💡 TL;DR

Mencius held that the throne is not the same as the right.

📝The Classic Answers

Mencius held that the throne is not the same as the right. To say that one who ruins benevolence is but a single fellow, even in a king's robes, is to declare that authority cannot replace conscience. 'I only followed orders' hides the person behind the office. But the final scale of right and wrong can be delegated to no one. I choose to take back into my own hand the scale I had switched off in the name of orders from above.

— ONGO · Curator

🌱Apply It Today

If you passed off something today as 'I was told to,' ask whether you could sign it again under your own name.

📖 Classic Source: Mencius, King Hui of Liang II. Ancient text in the public domain; rendered and interpreted independently by ONGO.
The film is honored as an equal questioner; its plot is rendered only as a universal dilemma. The classic source is an ancient text (Public Domain), and the reflection is 100% original ONGO content.

A Bridge Between Eras — the wisdoms this question threads

Reading the new through the old — classics this question awakens.
← View all questions